Northern Exposure
Coupling on NBC, Two and a Half Men on CBS
The trouble, of course, with the recent burst of gay and lesbian characters on American TV is that they become the immediate targets of self-appointed cultural critics. Everyone from the New York Times to GLAAD has an opinion: They’re too gay (Queer Eye for the Straight Guy) or not gay enough (Will & Grace). They’re offensive stereotypes (Queer as Folk) or laughable fakes (Boy Meets Boy). Whatever the show, whomever the character, there’s always going to be someone telling us what’s wrong with it.
There’s a reason for that. Most TV shows do a wretched job at creating believable characters, gay or straight. Two new sitcoms — CBS’s Two and a Half Men and NBC’s Coupling — do an especially fantastic job at getting it wrong. Yes, the number counters will point happily to lesbian Judith (Two and a Half Men) and bisexual Jane (Coupling) as further evidence of social progress in primetime. But like most of what’s new on TV this fall, the networks over-promise and under-whelm.
For those who believe the sitcom is a dying art form, Two and a Half Men signals it’s moved to the I.C.U. Charlie Sheen plays a carefree playboy who spends his days writing ad jingles and his nights getting drunk and chasing women. That glorious life is interrupted when his brother, Alan, and 10-year-old nephew move into his Malibu bungalow. Alan’s wife, Judith, has left him after realizing she’s a lesbian.
Sitcoms, if anything, are predictable — so you can pretty much guess what happens next. Charlie introduces his nephew to his bachelor ways: poker with the boys, Corona for breakfast, cruising the ladies. And Alan responds with an appropriate amount of shock and horror: “You did what with a 10-year old? ”
 Not much underneath: Cast of NBC’s Coupling |
I’m not exactly sure what constitutes a successful sitcom these days (can it only live on HBO?), but the fact that I didn’t laugh once — not even a giggle — is a safe bet something’s amiss. Whoever focus-grouped this thing needs to be fired. Now that I think of it, that’d be a great show — watching real Americans tell CBS why this show sucks.
Coupling, despite its reliance on trite jokes and crude sex talk, has more promise. NBC execs are hoping for a smash hit from this BBC import, praying that it will take the place of the all-dominant Friends, which ends its run this May.
The first two episodes are as unsatisfying as they are unfunny. The pedestrian scripts do little more with bisexual Jane than include a spate of bad three-way jokes. “It’s too bad you didn’t mention this lesbian [fantasy] of yours when we were going out, ” Jane tells her horny ex, Steve. “We could have had a threesome. ”
Steve, of course, gets all hot and bothered by this comment and sports that dumb look sitcom producers mistake for, what, desire? The “hilarity ” continues as Steve and his dopey friends get boners at a funeral while imagining the girls getting it on.
In spite of this, there’s hope for Coupling. The cast seems genuinely bored with the material (that’s a good thing), and there’s room for the plot to grow. More important is that NBC appears committed to the program and might give it the time to finds its legs. I suspect fans may one day look back on the first few episodes as quaint, dated accidents.
Two and a Half Men faces a more uncertain future, and deservedly so. I’m loathe to imagine a whole season of 10-year-old Jake slowly breaking down Charlie’s thick exterior in a string of dull storylines: Jake’s first soccer game, Jake’s first nightmare, Jake’s first cigar. Not to mention the predictable lesbian jokes: “You’re wife’s out meeting chicks, why shouldn’t you? ” Charlie ribs his brother.
Some will herald these shows as important breakthroughs in the history of gay and lesbian TV, but I can’t jump on that bandwagon. Yes, more gay representation in media is wonderful, but bad TV is still bad TV, folks. Don’t waste your time.
Support Metro Weekly’s Journalism
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
