Labor Department asked to withdraw new LGBT workplace protections
Two Republican congressmen who work on employment issues are calling on the Labor Department to withdraw a new rule prohibiting federal contractors from LGBT workplace discrimination.
Reps. John Kline (Minn.), chairman of the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and Tim Walberg (Mich.), chairman of the Subcommittee on Workforce Protections, requested the Labor Department allow a 60-day public comment period for the rule announced earlier this week in a letter to the office tasked with enforcing the new protections.
“[W]e understand the public was not afforded an opportunity to submit comments as provided under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA),” the two Republican congressman wrote. “Public comment is essential to all rulemakings. Section 553 of the APA requires general notice of proposed rulemaking to ‘give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making through submission of written data, views, or arguments.’ As such, we request the public be afforded at least 60 days to comment on the regulations implementing EO 13672 prior to issuance of a final rule.”
The letter, dated Dec. 3, the same day the new rule was announced by the Labor Department, is addressed to Patricia Shiu, director of the Labor Department’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs.
“We therefore urge OFCCP to withdraw its final regulation submitted to OMB under RIN 1250-A07 so the process for implementing EO 13672 can be done with the transparency and public participation typically affording under the APA,” the letter continued. Kline and Walberg asked Shiu to respond no later than Dec. 17.
The rule in question implements Executive Order 13672, signed by President Barack Obama on July 21, and prohibits contractors who do work with the federal government from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. The rule will go into effect on April 6, 2015 — 120 days after its publication by the Federal Register on Friday.
Following the submission of the proposed rule to the Office of Management and Budget for review in October, a Labor Department official told Metro Weekly that a public comment period was not required.
“In cases like this, where an agency only makes a change that an EO requires, agencies may publish final rules without notice and comment,” the official said at the time. “Its submission as a final rule is consistent with similar changes the department has made in response to executive orders in the past, such as the final rule the Bush Administration issued to implement the Executive Order that added a religious exemption to EO 11246.”
That was a sentiment echoed by Tico Almeida, president and founder of Freedom to Work, who accused Kline of playing politics.
“Kline represents a moderate district where majorities of voters support LGBT workplace protections, so this is clearly an example of Kline pandering to the extremist Tony Perkins element of the Republican base,” Almeida stated. “Kline is waging a war that is a real political loser for the Republican Party, and he’s on the wrong side of history.”
Support Metro Weekly’s Journalism
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.