On Tuesday, Tennessee lawmakers approved — without debate — a resolution expressing “disagreement with the constitutional analysis” of Obergefell v. Hodges, the case that legalized marriage equality nationwide. The measure now passes out of committee and heads to the full House of Representatives for consideration.
Although the resolution is only symbolic, it allows Tennessee lawmakers to express their distaste for the Supreme Court’s decision and for same-sex marriage in general.
“Though only symbolic, the House Civil Justice Committee’s shameful vote to encourage defiance of the highest court in the United States is a slap in the face to loving and committed same-sex couples all over the Volunteer State,” Sarah Warbelow, the legal director of the Human Rights Campaign, said in a statement. “Lawmakers should be using their time and resources to help all families, but instead have prioritized harmful attacks on LGBT Tennesseans. We urge elected officials in the House to reject this mean-spirited resolution that serves absolutely no legitimate purpose.”
Tennessee lawmakers had previously considered a bill known as the Tennessee Natural Marriage Defense Act, which was defeated earlier this session. That bill would have required state officials to “defend natural marriage as between one man and one woman,” as defined by voters in their 2006 constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage and other relationships. It also would have required the state attorney general to defend any state or local official who refuses to recognize same-sex marriages. Opponents have pointed to that provision by drawing parallels to the situation faced by Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis, who went to jail last year rather than allow her deputies to issue same-sex marriage licenses.
Multiple counties around the state have also been pushing resolutions calling on the legislature to defy the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell. Those behind the resolutions, namely the Family Action Council of Tennessee (FACT), hope to push such measures in at least 38 of 50 states with the intent of calling for a constitutional convention to overturn the court’s ruling and permanently ban same-sex marriage in the U.S. Constitution.
“HJR 529 sends a message that Tennessee’s Legislature would disrupt the marriages of thousands of LGBT people in our state if they could,” Chris Sanders, executive director of the Tennessee Equality Project, said in a statement. “Though without the force of the law, the resolution is a painful reminder of how strong the will to discriminate is and of the challenges we must overcome.”
Republicans in nine states are calling for the overturn of marriage equality.
In Idaho, Michigan, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota, lawmakers have introduced resolutions demanding the U.S. Supreme Court reverse its landmark 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, in which the court struck down all existing state-level same-sex marriage bans.
Last month, the Idaho House of Representatives voted 46-24 to approve one such resolution, asking the nation's highest court to "restore the natural definition of marriage, a union of one man and one woman."
While the resolution is non-binding and doesn't require the Supreme Court to take action, Republican lawmakers see it as a "messaging" bill that expresses their extreme displeasure with same-sex marriage.
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to take up a challenge to a Tennessee law seeking to restrict drag performances in the state.
In a brief, unsigned order, the court's current justices denied a request from Friends of George's Inc., a Tennessee-based theater company known for its drag performances, asking the high court to intervene in the case, reports The Hill.
As a result, the law will remain in effect.
In July, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled, in a 2-1 decision, that Friends of George's lacked standing to challenge the Adult Entertainment Act on the grounds that its performances would have some artistic value and would not violate the law's restrictions on so-called "adult cabaret entertainment." That decision overturned a lower court’s finding that the law was unconstitutional and infringed on the free expression rights of performers.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.