On Tuesday, Tennessee lawmakers approved — without debate — a resolution expressing “disagreement with the constitutional analysis” of Obergefell v. Hodges, the case that legalized marriage equality nationwide. The measure now passes out of committee and heads to the full House of Representatives for consideration.
Although the resolution is only symbolic, it allows Tennessee lawmakers to express their distaste for the Supreme Court’s decision and for same-sex marriage in general.
“Though only symbolic, the House Civil Justice Committee’s shameful vote to encourage defiance of the highest court in the United States is a slap in the face to loving and committed same-sex couples all over the Volunteer State,” Sarah Warbelow, the legal director of the Human Rights Campaign, said in a statement. “Lawmakers should be using their time and resources to help all families, but instead have prioritized harmful attacks on LGBT Tennesseans. We urge elected officials in the House to reject this mean-spirited resolution that serves absolutely no legitimate purpose.”
Tennessee lawmakers had previously considered a bill known as the Tennessee Natural Marriage Defense Act, which was defeated earlier this session. That bill would have required state officials to “defend natural marriage as between one man and one woman,” as defined by voters in their 2006 constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage and other relationships. It also would have required the state attorney general to defend any state or local official who refuses to recognize same-sex marriages. Opponents have pointed to that provision by drawing parallels to the situation faced by Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis, who went to jail last year rather than allow her deputies to issue same-sex marriage licenses.
Multiple counties around the state have also been pushing resolutions calling on the legislature to defy the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell. Those behind the resolutions, namely the Family Action Council of Tennessee (FACT), hope to push such measures in at least 38 of 50 states with the intent of calling for a constitutional convention to overturn the court’s ruling and permanently ban same-sex marriage in the U.S. Constitution.
“HJR 529 sends a message that Tennessee’s Legislature would disrupt the marriages of thousands of LGBT people in our state if they could,” Chris Sanders, executive director of the Tennessee Equality Project, said in a statement. “Though without the force of the law, the resolution is a painful reminder of how strong the will to discriminate is and of the challenges we must overcome.”
A recently unearthed video clip of Pete Hegseth, Donald Trump's pick for U.S. Secretary of Defense, shows the former Army National Guard officer lamenting that allowing LGBTQ service members to serve openly, and allowing women into combat roles, would erode military standards.
Hegseth, a former Fox News contributor, made the comments during a 2015 appearance on the station's Red Eye program. (MeidasTouch News obtained and posted the clip to its website.) During a panel discussion, Hegseth accused military higher ups, under former President Barack Obama's administration, of engaging in "social engineering" by pushing for greater inclusivity instead of improving national security.
Idaho Republicans are pushing for a resolution urging the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn its 2015 ruling legalizing marriage equality nationwide.
An Idaho House of Representatives committee will consider a measure from State Rep. Heather Scott (R-Blanchard) that declares the high court's ruling in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges an "illegitimate overreach."
Scott's resolution asks the court to reinstate the "natural definition of marriage," limiting the practice to heterosexual couples only.
For a decade, conservatives have bemoaned the court's decision, which struck down state-level bans on same-sex marriage as unconstitutional. They complain that the court imposed a one-size-fits-all approach that promotes a particular ideological view of marriage.
Same-sex couples in Liechtenstein can finally marry after the country's new law legalizing marriage equality took effect on January 1, 2025.
The law, which passed in May of 2024, with 24 of 25 members of Liechtenstein's parliament in favor of it, was supported by the ruling parliamentary coalition, including the conservative-leaning Progressive Citizens' Party and the center-left Patriotic Union.
At the time, Daniel Seger, the spokesperson for the Progressive Citizens' Party, said lawmakers felt social pressure to pass the law. A 2017 online poll conducted by the Liechtensteiner Vaterland found that 69% of citizens supported permitting same-sex couples to marry.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.