Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam (Photo: U.S. Department of Agriculture, via Wikimedia).
Lawmakers in Tennessee passed a bill last week that allows counselors and therapists to claim a religious or moral exemption for treating patients referred to them.
The measure allows mental health professionals, counselors and other therapists to refuse to see clients whose cases go against their “sincerely held principles.” Those who refuse to treat someone due to, say, their sexual orientation would be protected from the threat of lawsuits or criminal prosecution, as well as any retaliatory action by state government, such as the denial of special tax breaks, grants or government contracts. The bill does require those who refuse to treat patients based on that objection to refer them to another counselor or therapist who will take the case. The bill passed in the House of Representatives by a 68-22 margin.
The Senate version of the bill easily passed the upper chamber by a 27-5 margin, but the bill must be amended further, since the House changed the Senate’s wording from “sincerely held religious belief” to “sincerely held principles,” reports The Tennessean. In doing so, they expanded the number of people able to claim an exemption beyond just those who object based on religion but on moral principles, which requires a much lower threshold for justification. If the Senate approves the revised language, the bill will head to the desk of Gov. Bill Haslam (R), who must either veto it or sign it into law.
But Haslam has been reticent to publicly endorse any anti-LGBT legislation sent to him by the General Assembly. A spokeswoman for the governor’s office previously noted that Haslam had reservations about signing a separate anti-LGBT bill that requires students in educational settings to use only the restroom or changing facility that corresponds to their biological sex at birth as listed on their birth certificate. As a result of both the “bathroom bill” and this religious exemption bill, Haslam is facing economic pressure from the business community to veto both measures. If either bill becomes law, Tennessee could potentially see businesses scuttle plans to relocate to, expand in, or hold conventions in the state.
Proponents on the measure argue that the bill is necessary to protect the free speech and conscience rights of therapists. They say they are responding to a change that the American Counseling Association made to its code of ethics in 2014. That provision says that a counselor or therapist cannot refuse to treat a client based solely on the therapist’s “personally held values, attitudes, beliefs and behaviors.”
“They have elevated their code above the First Amendment and we need to correct that, and that’s why this bill is here today,” Rep. Dan Howell (R-Georgetown), the chief sponsor of the bill, said of the ACA’s change during the floor debate last week.
Democrats and LGBT legislative allies tried to introduce six different amendments that would lessen the sting of the exemptions provided to therapists. One would have prohibited therapists from exercising the exemption when the clients are minors who are victims of bullying, and one would have prevented the therapist from charging the client they are refusing to treat. Another would have required any therapist with those objections to post a public notice stating that they reserve the right to refuse to treat patients based on religious objections, and include that notice in any advertising materials.
The Tennessee Equality Project is circulating a petition asking Haslam to veto the bill if it reaches his desk, noting that the bill — especially in light of the failure of the proposed anti-bullying amendment — leaves youth, particularly those in rural areas where mental health services are not widely available, vulnerable.
“This bill puts the focus on the desires of counselors rather than on the needs of clients, damaging the counseling profession and putting clients at risk,” the petition reads. As of Monday evening, more than 2600 people had signed the petition.
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to take up a challenge to a Tennessee law seeking to restrict drag performances in the state.
In a brief, unsigned order, the court's current justices denied a request from Friends of George's Inc., a Tennessee-based theater company known for its drag performances, asking the high court to intervene in the case, reports The Hill.
As a result, the law will remain in effect.
In July, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled, in a 2-1 decision, that Friends of George's lacked standing to challenge the Adult Entertainment Act on the grounds that its performances would have some artistic value and would not violate the law's restrictions on so-called "adult cabaret entertainment." That decision overturned a lower court’s finding that the law was unconstitutional and infringed on the free expression rights of performers.
Republicans in nine states are calling for the overturn of marriage equality.
In Idaho, Michigan, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota, lawmakers have introduced resolutions demanding the U.S. Supreme Court reverse its landmark 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, in which the court struck down all existing state-level same-sex marriage bans.
Last month, the Idaho House of Representatives voted 46-24 to approve one such resolution, asking the nation's highest court to "restore the natural definition of marriage, a union of one man and one woman."
While the resolution is non-binding and doesn't require the Supreme Court to take action, Republican lawmakers see it as a "messaging" bill that expresses their extreme displeasure with same-sex marriage.
A California appeals court has ruled in favor of a lesbian couple, finding that a baker discriminated against them when she refused to sell them a generic wedding cake.
The case deals with an exception to a loophole that many conservatives believe they had carved out, enabling them to openly discriminate against LGBTQ people in the provision of public goods or services.
In 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Colorado baker who objected to creating a custom-made wedding cake for a gay couple's wedding, finding that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission had been unfairly prejudiced against the baker's religious beliefs.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.