Roland Emmerich: Stonewall was “a white event, let’s be honest”
Emmerich is still whitewashing history, because facts (and good filmmaking) continue to evade him
“Stonewall was a white event, let’s be honest.”
—Roland Emmerich, in a comment almost as tone-deaf as the entire runtime of last year’s whitewashed, historically inaccurate bomb Stonewall, which he produced and directed.
Speaking with The Guardian, Emmerich tried to defend against the massive criticism he endured for Stonewall, which ignored the major role of LGBT people of color in order to cast a cis white guy (played by a straight actor) as the hero of the infamous 1969 riots, which birthed the modern LGBT rights movement.
“My movie was exactly what they said it wasn’t. It was politically correct,” he said. “It had black, transgender people in there. We just got killed by one voice on the internet who saw a trailer and said, this is whitewashing Stonewall. Stonewall was a white event, let’s be honest. But nobody wanted to hear that any more.”
When the original trailer for Emmerich’s film was released, it led to calls of whitewashing, which eventually became so severe that a petition was started calling for a boycott. It accused Emmerich of “erasing the contributions of of-color queer and gender non-comforming activists.”
Emmerich responded by asking people to watch the finished film, claiming that it would help settle any worries that it had rewritten history to appeal to white people. Unfortunately, critics disagreed.
“A vanity project of astonishingly huge proportions, Stonewall is the deeply misguided work of a white, gay, obscenely privileged man proclaiming, ‘This is how I see our history,'” wrote Randy Shulman in our review of the film. Stonewall ultimately bombed at the box office, taking in less than $300,000.
Support Metro Weekly’s Journalism
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.