An upstate New York county has settled a lawsuit brought against it by a retired transgender county employee who was denied insurance coverage for transition-related care.
Oswego County and the Oswego County Department of Social Services have agreed to compensate Sean Simonson, a former case worker for the county, for out-of-pocket medical expenses he incurred after the country’s health insurance plan refused to cover his gender confirmation surgery.
Simonson was diagnosed with gender dysphoria in February 2015, after which he began taking steps to transition, including legally changing his name. As part of his doctor-recommended treatment for gender dysphoria, Simsonson was placed on hormone replacement therapy and urged to receive a double mastectomy.
However, Simonson was denied coverage because of a discriminatory exclusion in his county-provided health insurance plan — which has since been eliminated — that refused to cover the cost of hormones or gender confirmation surgery, deeming them cosmetic rather than medically necessary. Both Simonson and his doctor appealed to the insurance company, which rejected the appeals, and Simonson eventually filed a complaint against the county with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
In June 2017, the EEOC issued a determination finding reasonable cause to believe that Oswego County and its Department of Social Services had discriminated against Simonson due to his gender identity, which constituted a form of sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
After obtaining a right-to-sue letter from the U.S. Department of Justice, Lambda Legal filed a federal lawsuit alleging that Oswego County’s policy and its denial of coverage violated several federal and state laws prohibiting sex-based discrimination. In its rationale for the lawsuit, Lambda Legal argued that the health insurance plan’s exclusion on transition-related care was discriminatory because, had Simonson been a cisgender woman urged by her personal doctor to receive a mastectomy, the procedure would have been covered.
In agreeing to settle the lawsuit, Oswego County agrees to compensate Simonson, not only for his out-of-pocket medical costs, but for the emotional distress, suffering, embarrassment, humiliation, pain and anguish, stigmatization, and loss of dignity he suffered when he was denied care that his doctor has deemed medically necessary. The county also agrees to cover Simonson’s attorneys’ fees and other legal costs as part of the settlement.
Just days before Simonson filed his lawsuit, the New York Attorney General’s Office announced an agreement, under which Oswego County ensure that, going forward, transgender employees and retirees would be entitled to have their transition-related care covered through their employer-provided health plan. That agreement required the county to eliminate the exclusion in the health care plan, provide training to county employees and employees of its benefits administrator on the new policy, and address any complaints or hindrances that transgender employees or retirees might encounter when trying to get medically necessary procedures covered.
However, the agreement did not provide compensation for Simonson or others who had been denied care, which prompted Lambda Legal to follow through with the lawsuit. The county eventually determined that it was in its best interest to agree to a financial settlement with Simonson rather than pursue a drawn-out court battle.
“While Oswego County finally rescinded its discriminatory policy in November 2017 after years of advocacy by Sean and Lambda Legal, the amendment to the County’s health plan did not fully address the harms imposed by the discrimination against Sean nor did it acknowledge the County’s legal responsibility to not discriminate against transgender employees,” Omar Gonzales-Pagan, a senior attorney and health care strategist at Lambda Legal, said in a statement, adding that the county’s previous refusal to acknowledge the harm done to Simonson was “wrong.”
“Importantly, as part of the settlement, the County has now acknowledged, both within the settlement agreement and on the record in open court, that current federal and state law prohibit discrimination against transgender individuals in their compensation and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment, including the terms of municipal health benefit plans,” Gonzales-Pagan added.
Simonson said in a statement that he was happy that the county acknowledged its error and was taking steps not to repeat it
“I am proud of the role I played in changing the county’s policy so that no other transgender employee will ever be denied coverage for transition-related care, like I was,” he said. “I am also proud of my 30-year career as an Oswego County case worker for the Department of Social Services. Helping the communities I am a part of is, and always has been, very important to me.”
The Trump administration officially banned Pride flags and other flags associated with left-wing causes from flying at U.S. embassies and outposts.
As first reported by The Washington Free Beacon, the U.S. State Department has adopted a "One Flag Policy" order, which permits only the American flag to be flown at U.S. facilities.
"Starting immediately, only the United States of America flag is authorized to be flown or displayed at U.S. facilities, both domestic and abroad, and featured in U.S. government content," the order states.
"The flag of the United States of America united all Americans under the universal principles of justice, liberty, and democracy. These values, which are the bedrock of our great country, are shared by all American citizens, past and present. The U.S. flag is a powerful symbol of pride and it is fitting and respectful that only the U.S. flag be flown or displayed at U.S. facilities, both domestically and abroad."
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has ordered employees to stop processing claims from LGBTQ individuals alleging violations of their rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of "sex."
In a 2020 court case, the U.S. Supreme Court found that the federal civil rights law's protections extend to instances where employees have been fired or denied promotions due to their sexual orientation or gender identity.
The finding in that case runs counter to the Trump administration's recent executive orders refusing to recognize gender identity as valid and recognizing "sex" as fixed and congruent with one's assigned sex at birth.
Donald Trump signed an executive order restricting people under the age of 19 from accessing medical treatments or procedures intended to help them undergo a gender transition.
The order, issued on January 28 and titled “Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation,” prohibits federal funds from being used to cover the cost of such treatments for minors.
The order also directs federal agencies to ensure that medical schools and hospitals receiving any research or education grants are not conducting research on -- or providing minors with access to -- gender-affirming treatments.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.