CNN hosts Jim Sciutto and Poppy Harlow pushed back against a right-wing commentator after a homophobic attempt to call former Mayor Pete Buttigieg less “masculine” than Donald Trump.
Conservative radio host and CNN contributor Ben Ferguson appeared on CNN on Thursday to discuss recent comments made by controversial media personality Rush Limbaugh.
Limbaugh, who has a history of racist, sexist, and anti-LGBTQ comments, claimed America wouldn’t elect Buttigieg as president because he “loves to kiss his husband” Chasten Buttigieg.
CNN host Jim Sciutto asked Ferguson about the comments, to which Ferguson responded by claiming Buttigieg’s masculinity was inferior to Trump’s.
“I don’t think it matters that he’s gay,” Ferguson said, in comments reported by Raw Story. “I think that the thing that you are talking about here is two different issues. One, is anybody going to look masculine next to Donald Trump on stage? I think the only Democrat out there would be [former Vice President] Joe Biden.
“Do I think it should matter on the issue of his sexuality? No,” Ferguson continued, noting that he had discussed the issue on his radio show the previous day with Democratic callers.
“Does it matter that he is an openly gay man? There was a surprising number of Democratic voters that said that it was an issue for them,” he said.
He added he has “no problem with [Buttigieg] being a gay man,” but said there are “Democrats sitting there worried that this is going to be a bigger issue.”
Ferguson then referenced the voter in Iowa who, after learning that Pete Buttigieg is gay, asked to withdraw her vote for the former mayor.
But Sciutto had no time for Ferguson’s veiled attempt at homophobia, shutting it down by directly contrasting Buttigieg record with Trump.
“What’s more manly? Volunteering for military service, as Pete Buttigieg did, or avoiding it?” Sciutto asked.
“I’m talking about appearance,” Ferguson responded, again claiming that Trump was more “masculine” in appearance.
“What about the substance?” Sciutto interrupted. “You said the president appears more manly for — I don’t know what reason. I’m citing an issue of the record here. Buttigieg volunteered for military service, the president took great pains to avoid it. I’m talking about the substance. Which is more manly?”
Ferguson said that “serving your country is something that’s a great thing,” but refused back down.
“If you asked 100 Democratic voters which candidate looked more masculine, Joe Biden or Mayor Pete, I think they’d probably say Joe Biden,” he said.
CNN host Poppy Harlow then asked, “In what world is the definition of the qualification for being president of the United States how manly someone appears?”
“I did not say it was a qualification,” Ferguson responded. “When you put two different candidates on stage and there are people that make millions of dollars on both sides of the aisle that talk about what you wear for goodness sakes — men and women — what you say–“
“We don’t,” Harlow interjected.
Ferguson attempted to justify his argument by once again referencing Biden’s masculinity compared to Trump, before Sciutto stepped in to put an end to it all.
“It seems to me you’re justifying bigotry,” he said.
“Not at all,” Ferguson responded.
“Are you not?” Sciutto said. “Because here’s the thing, consultants might have said it’s a negative to be a person of color, you might have heard that. This is the year 2020. I’m just curious what you’re justifying here.”
Watch the exchange below:
Related:
Rush Limbaugh: Americans won’t vote for Pete Buttigieg because he ‘loves to kiss his husband’
Sanders wins New Hampshire, Buttigieg continues to lead in overall delegates
Read more:
Allegheny County Council unexpectedly bans conversion therapy
Federal court dismisses lawsuit from evanglical professor disciplined for misgendering trans student
California Democrat introduces bill to end insurance discrimination against people with HIV
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.