Jenna Ellis, a senior legal advisor to the Trump 2020 campaign, is doubling down on the campaign’s outreach to social conservatives by telling those who are unhappy or distressed over recent Supreme Court decisions that they should re-elect President Trump.
In a June 24 interview on The Eric Metaxas Radio Show, a radio show geared towards religious conservatives, Ellis lamented some recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings on immigration policy and LGBTQ rights that went against the Trump administration’s stated position.
Ellis claimed that Chief Justice John Roberts, who she derided as a “liberal,” and Justice Neil Gorsuch, who, respectively, wrote the majority opinions in the cases, had “abandoned” the Constitution by violating the separation of powers and legislating from the bench to produce certain outcomes.
“You can’t input your own political agenda and your politics into the law,” Ellis said in the video clip, obtained by Right Wing Watch, a project of People for the American Way, and posted to YouTube.
Referring to the Supreme Court’s decision finding LGBTQ people are protected from discrimination by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Ellis said: “So [the justices] took this 1964 law and said ‘Even though we all agree that the term “sex” means the biological difference between men and women, we’re just going to go ahead and decide for the legislature that we are going to add into that definition more protected categories, including sexual orientation and gender identity.'”
Ellis, a fellow at Liberty University’s Falkirk Center, said that she and other social conservatives, as well as President Trump, were “shocked” by Gorsuch’s decision in the LGTBQ workplace discrimination case, noting that social conservatives had initially cheered Trump’s appointment of Gorsuch.
But she argued that the solution was to appoint more conservative justices to the Supreme Court, thus requiring that social conservatives turn out in droves in November’s election to re-elect Trump.
“We have to understand that the comprehensive nature of how much goes up in front of our Supreme Court, we have to make sure that jurists comprehensively are originalists, and what I think we have to do for the next four years, including voting for President Trump in November and making sure that he gets more Supreme Court appointments, is to hear from other groups outside just the Federalist Society that are concerned about mechanics,” Ellis said, referring to a right-wing legal organization that is primarily concerned with promoting a libertarian economic doctrine among the nation’s judges.
“We also have to be concerned about the social issues to make sure that the Supreme Court stays in their lane,” Ellis said. “But we have to give President Trump another four years because — listen, no justice is ever going to get things 100 percent correct all of the time.
“And even though what Gorsuch did in this decision was absolutely terrible, he has had a stellar track record over the last three years on the bench,” she added. “And if President Trump was appointing two or three more conservative justices, if we had a wider margin, then when one or two justices get one decision wrong, they will always be in the minority, and we could have a Supreme Court that we could depend on to actually interpret the Constitution as meant and stay in their lane.”
Ellis noted that Trump, as he did in 2016, has promised to release a list of possible Supreme Court nominees to fill any vacancy that arises on the high court, and has been incorporating suggestions from various groups, including those affiliated with the Religious Right, to ensure that those on his short-list are acceptable to social conservatives.
“He, of course, was very disappointed in this decision. He’s saying, ‘I’m going to go back and re-evaluate the list. Let me know, faith groups that are concerned about religious liberty, concerned about preserving the Constitution,’ and I have no doubt that that list is going to be more comprehensive, and we can rely on President Trump to continue to protect religious freedom, protect the principles of the Constitution and the text of the Constitution. With his next appointments, we’re just going to keep getting better.”
See Right Wing Watch’s video of Ellis’ comments below:
Republicans in nine states are calling for the overturn of marriage equality.
In Idaho, Michigan, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota, lawmakers have introduced resolutions demanding the U.S. Supreme Court reverse its landmark 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, in which the court struck down all existing state-level same-sex marriage bans.
Last month, the Idaho House of Representatives voted 46-24 to approve one such resolution, asking the nation's highest court to "restore the natural definition of marriage, a union of one man and one woman."
While the resolution is non-binding and doesn't require the Supreme Court to take action, Republican lawmakers see it as a "messaging" bill that expresses their extreme displeasure with same-sex marriage.
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to take up a challenge to a Colorado law prohibiting mental health therapists from subjecting LGBTQ youth to conversion therapy.
The court will hear the case during its next term, which begins in October and runs through June 2026.
Conversion therapy is a practice intended to change a person's sexual orientation or gender identity to align with heterosexual or cisgender norms. Most mainstream medical organizations have largely discredited it as ineffective and potentially even harmful.
Yet, many social conservatives insist that people who hold religious beliefs opposing homosexuality should be allowed to enroll their children, or, in the case of adults, themselves, in the practice.
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to take up a challenge to a Tennessee law seeking to restrict drag performances in the state.
In a brief, unsigned order, the court's current justices denied a request from Friends of George's Inc., a Tennessee-based theater company known for its drag performances, asking the high court to intervene in the case, reports The Hill.
As a result, the law will remain in effect.
In July, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled, in a 2-1 decision, that Friends of George's lacked standing to challenge the Adult Entertainment Act on the grounds that its performances would have some artistic value and would not violate the law's restrictions on so-called "adult cabaret entertainment." That decision overturned a lower court’s finding that the law was unconstitutional and infringed on the free expression rights of performers.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.