Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin – Photo Illustration: Todd Franson
The Virginia Department of Education has released new policy guidelines outlining how schools are to treat and accommodate transgender and nonbinary students, imposing many sex-based restrictions on such students and requiring teachers to inform on such students to their parents.
Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin, whose administration has pushed for the policies, touted the guidelines as empowering parents while creating allegedly “safe” learning environments for students.
“This is about doing what’s best for the child,” Youngkin told the Associated Press. “And oh, by the way, also recognizing that we need to ensure the privacy and dignity and respect of all children and all parents in the school system. And that’s what I think we have … very carefully constructed here.”
Critics panned the guidelines for encouraging teachers and fellow students to discriminate against or harass LGBTQ students by misgendering them; placing restrictions on their access to facilities, support services, and school-sponsored activities; and potentially increasing feelings of suicidal ideation among transgender, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming youth.
Some critics have even alleged that, as written, the policies contradict existing court cases or federal laws prohibiting discrimination against LGBTQ people.
Under the finalized policies, teachers are required to report a student’s gender identity or sexual orientation to their parents if students make such a disclosure to school staff, potentially “outing” students to their parents. The same applies for students who have expressed suicidal thoughts or feelings.
The guidelines prohibit schools from using a student’s preferred name and pronouns unless a student’s parents have provided written notice of their consent and a legal document, such as a birth certificate, state- or federal-issued identification, passport, or a court order recognizing a student’s legal name change and any gender-marker changes.
Yet even in cases where parental consent has been received and official documentation submitted, teachers and fellow students are permitted to misgender trans-identifying students, and will not be disciplined for such actions — even if they rise to the level of bullying or harassment, which the guidelines purport to prohibit — on the grounds of free speech or religious objections to homosexuality or gender-nonconformity.
The guidelines require parents to be notified of, and sign off on, any guidance or counseling services that their children receive, and require schools to designate an administrator or counselor to speak with a student’s parents and the student on questions relating to gender identity.
The guidelines purport to oppose bullying and harassment, requiring parents to be notified within 24 hours of any incident, and encourages administrators to intervene “immediately” to stop such behavior — except in cases where gender-nonconforming students are misgendered.
The model policies also prevent students from using facilities, including restrooms and locker rooms, that align with their gender identity — except where federal or state law requires otherwise.
If federal or state law requires access to gender-affirming facilities, then schools must allow parents of cisgender students to “opt out” of transgender-inclusive facilities and given access to alternative facilities.
Schools must also provide single-user restrooms and changing facilities for all students, regardless of gender.
For overnight trips, students must room with other students sharing the same assigned sex at birth. For extracurricular activities or school athletics requiring sex segregation, students can only participate or compete in activities based on their assigned sex at birth.
Students are not required to dress in gender-neutral or gender-specific clothing in public schools. Still, they will be required, regardless of gender, to dress in a manner “consistent with maintaining a respectful, distraction-free environment” — a vague, undefined phrase that will likely give administrators license to object to, and potentially penalize students for wearing, gender-nonconforming clothing that offends administrators’ personal tastes or sensibilities.
Virginia Department of Education officials defended the finalized policies.
“There is nothing more important than creating a safe and vibrant learning environment for all our students,” Secretary of Education Aimee Guidera said in a statement. “These policies clarify that parents are the appropriate decision-makers regarding their child’s health and wellbeing, and that students are best served when parents, teachers, and school administrators work as a team to support a child’s education. They also affirm that discrimination and bullying of any kind will not be tolerated in Virginia’s public schools.”
Dr. Lisa Coons, the Superintendent of Public Instruction, argued that the changes allow parents to be partners with teachers and administrators in their children’s education, and encouraged all school boards in the state to adopt policies either identical to, or similar in scope to, the model policies.
LGBTQ advocates objected to the guidelines, casting them as an attack on transgender, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming students, and encouraged more liberal-leaning local school boards to resist adopting the model policies — just as conservative-leaning boards refused to adopt trans-friendly model policies under former Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam in 2021.
“We object to the VA DOE updated model policies. As unbelievable as it is, they are WORSE than those released in 2022. They purport to respect all students and parents, yet they actually manage to disrespect every family and student while specifically targeting our most vulnerable students,” FCPS Pride said in a statement.
“We are too smart and kind to fall for this effort to stoke fear, homophobia, and transphobia while imposing logistical and legal chaos on all Commonwealth public schools,” the organization, which CPS Pride advocates on behalf of LGBTQ students and staff in Fairfax County, continued. “We have spoken to [Superintendent] Dr. [Michelle] Reid, who has promised that Fairfax County Public Schools will do the right thing to protect our students, by ensuring that each and every student, including transgender and gender expansive students, will be welcome, safe, included, and respected in our schools.”
The Pride Liberation Project, the largest student-led LGBTQ advocacy group in the commonwealth, condemned the new VDOE guidelines, dubbing them collectively as the “Don’t Be Trans” policies.
“As a current transgender student, ‘Don’t Be Trans’ makes me feel extremely anxious to go to school. I feel like school isn’t a safe place for me anymore because these guidelines force me to hide my true self,” Spencer Vernon, a student in York County, said in a statement.
“My school used to have rainbow stickers that said we were a safe space, and they were really important for me to accept myself,” Icarus, a trans student in Virginia Beach, said in a statement. “‘Don’t Be Trans’ forces students back into the closet and takes away the safety I found in those rainbows. I’m terrified that my friends and siblings won’t be able to attend safe schools.”
The Colorado Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit against a Christian baker who refused to create a cake celebrating a gender transition for a transgender woman on procedural grounds.
In doing so, the court sidestepped the issue of whether -- and to what extent -- a person's First Amendment rights override local nondiscrimination laws.
Lower courts in Colorado had previously ruled in favor of the woman, Autumn Scardina, finding -- based on the facts of the case -- that Jack and Debra Phillips, the owners of Masterpiece Cakeshop, in Lakewood Colorado, had discriminated against her by refusing to bake a custom-made cake only after they found out the purported significance of the cake.
Ohio has passed a bill prohibiting schools from allowing transgender students to use bathroom facilities that match their gender identity.
The "Protect All Students Act" sailed through the Ohio State Senate on November 13 by a 24-7 party-line vote.
The bill's House counterpart was passed by the House of Representatives in June.
The bill now heads to the desk of Republican Gov. Mike DeWine, who has 10 days to sign it into law or veto it.
DeWine has said he's inclined to sign the monstrous bill, but wishes to conduct a legal review first to determine whether it will withstand scrutiny, according to The Associated Press.
A mother in Bellingham, Washington, is lambasting school officials for the way they responded after her 16-year-old transgender son was beaten by a group of students.
Police are investigating the alleged attack, which occurred off school grounds, and are pursuing both assault and hate crime charges against several juveniles believed to have been involved in the October 22 beating, which was recorded on video and posted to social media.
The 16-year-old sophomore claims members of the group shoved, struck, and beat them repeatedly while shouting anti-trans phrases at them. The victim was able to run away and seek refuge at Bellingham High School, where they informed administrators of the attack.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
The Virginia Department of Education has released new policy guidelines outlining how schools are to treat and accommodate transgender and nonbinary students, imposing many sex-based restrictions on such students and requiring teachers to inform on such students to their parents.
Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin, whose administration has pushed for the policies, touted the guidelines as empowering parents while creating allegedly “safe” learning environments for students.
“This is about doing what’s best for the child,” Youngkin told the Associated Press. “And oh, by the way, also recognizing that we need to ensure the privacy and dignity and respect of all children and all parents in the school system. And that’s what I think we have … very carefully constructed here.”
A draft of the so-called “model policies” sparked student-led protests across the commonwealth last year.
Critics panned the guidelines for encouraging teachers and fellow students to discriminate against or harass LGBTQ students by misgendering them; placing restrictions on their access to facilities, support services, and school-sponsored activities; and potentially increasing feelings of suicidal ideation among transgender, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming youth.
The model policies also reportedly received pushback during an online public comment period, with the overwhelming majority of the 71,000 comments appearing to oppose the policy.
Some critics have even alleged that, as written, the policies contradict existing court cases or federal laws prohibiting discrimination against LGBTQ people.
Under the finalized policies, teachers are required to report a student’s gender identity or sexual orientation to their parents if students make such a disclosure to school staff, potentially “outing” students to their parents. The same applies for students who have expressed suicidal thoughts or feelings.
The guidelines prohibit schools from using a student’s preferred name and pronouns unless a student’s parents have provided written notice of their consent and a legal document, such as a birth certificate, state- or federal-issued identification, passport, or a court order recognizing a student’s legal name change and any gender-marker changes.
Yet even in cases where parental consent has been received and official documentation submitted, teachers and fellow students are permitted to misgender trans-identifying students, and will not be disciplined for such actions — even if they rise to the level of bullying or harassment, which the guidelines purport to prohibit — on the grounds of free speech or religious objections to homosexuality or gender-nonconformity.
The guidelines require parents to be notified of, and sign off on, any guidance or counseling services that their children receive, and require schools to designate an administrator or counselor to speak with a student’s parents and the student on questions relating to gender identity.
The guidelines purport to oppose bullying and harassment, requiring parents to be notified within 24 hours of any incident, and encourages administrators to intervene “immediately” to stop such behavior — except in cases where gender-nonconforming students are misgendered.
The model policies also prevent students from using facilities, including restrooms and locker rooms, that align with their gender identity — except where federal or state law requires otherwise.
If federal or state law requires access to gender-affirming facilities, then schools must allow parents of cisgender students to “opt out” of transgender-inclusive facilities and given access to alternative facilities.
Schools must also provide single-user restrooms and changing facilities for all students, regardless of gender.
For overnight trips, students must room with other students sharing the same assigned sex at birth. For extracurricular activities or school athletics requiring sex segregation, students can only participate or compete in activities based on their assigned sex at birth.
Students are not required to dress in gender-neutral or gender-specific clothing in public schools. Still, they will be required, regardless of gender, to dress in a manner “consistent with maintaining a respectful, distraction-free environment” — a vague, undefined phrase that will likely give administrators license to object to, and potentially penalize students for wearing, gender-nonconforming clothing that offends administrators’ personal tastes or sensibilities.
Virginia Department of Education officials defended the finalized policies.
“There is nothing more important than creating a safe and vibrant learning environment for all our students,” Secretary of Education Aimee Guidera said in a statement. “These policies clarify that parents are the appropriate decision-makers regarding their child’s health and wellbeing, and that students are best served when parents, teachers, and school administrators work as a team to support a child’s education. They also affirm that discrimination and bullying of any kind will not be tolerated in Virginia’s public schools.”
Dr. Lisa Coons, the Superintendent of Public Instruction, argued that the changes allow parents to be partners with teachers and administrators in their children’s education, and encouraged all school boards in the state to adopt policies either identical to, or similar in scope to, the model policies.
LGBTQ advocates objected to the guidelines, casting them as an attack on transgender, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming students, and encouraged more liberal-leaning local school boards to resist adopting the model policies — just as conservative-leaning boards refused to adopt trans-friendly model policies under former Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam in 2021.
“We object to the VA DOE updated model policies. As unbelievable as it is, they are WORSE than those released in 2022. They purport to respect all students and parents, yet they actually manage to disrespect every family and student while specifically targeting our most vulnerable students,” FCPS Pride said in a statement.
“We are too smart and kind to fall for this effort to stoke fear, homophobia, and transphobia while imposing logistical and legal chaos on all Commonwealth public schools,” the organization, which CPS Pride advocates on behalf of LGBTQ students and staff in Fairfax County, continued. “We have spoken to [Superintendent] Dr. [Michelle] Reid, who has promised that Fairfax County Public Schools will do the right thing to protect our students, by ensuring that each and every student, including transgender and gender expansive students, will be welcome, safe, included, and respected in our schools.”
The Pride Liberation Project, the largest student-led LGBTQ advocacy group in the commonwealth, condemned the new VDOE guidelines, dubbing them collectively as the “Don’t Be Trans” policies.
“As a current transgender student, ‘Don’t Be Trans’ makes me feel extremely anxious to go to school. I feel like school isn’t a safe place for me anymore because these guidelines force me to hide my true self,” Spencer Vernon, a student in York County, said in a statement.
“My school used to have rainbow stickers that said we were a safe space, and they were really important for me to accept myself,” Icarus, a trans student in Virginia Beach, said in a statement. “‘Don’t Be Trans’ forces students back into the closet and takes away the safety I found in those rainbows. I’m terrified that my friends and siblings won’t be able to attend safe schools.”
READ NEXT