Listerine in Pride-themed packaging – Photo: Libs Of TikTok, via Twitter
Libs of TikTok is demanding a boycott of Listerine for packaging featuring Pride-themed illustrations on its bottle. Chaya Raichik, who runs the online account on social media, posted an image of the popular mouthwash in packaging with drawings of same-gender couples holding hands or displaying rainbow flags.
As previously noted by LGBTQ Nation, Libs of TikTok has been influential in shaping public opinion on LGBTQ-related issues on social media, often ginning up outrage among social conservatives over expressions of LGBTQ visibility.
The Pride-themed wrapping on the bottle mentions the “Care With Pride” initiative, started by pharmaceutical industry giant Johnson & Johnson, the parent company of Listerine.
The initiative raises money for LGBTQ advocacy organizations that support “full equality, inclusivity, care, and representation.”
In 2023, the initiative benefitted Family Equality, a group that advocates for full legal protections and lived equality for LGBTQ families.
“Listerine supports organizations who advocate for sex change surgeries for minors,” Libs for TikTok wrote in a post on the social media platform X. “They also make their stance clear with the packaging. Stop giving money to companies who hate you and what you stand for!”
The post also encouraged people to visit PublicSq., a right-wing app that encourages people to invest in and patronize “values-aligned” and “patriotic” businesses that stand for “traditional American values.”
Family Equality has been outspoken against recent bills in various states that restrict LGBTQ visibility, including bans on gender-affirming care.
The organization signed on to an amicus brief in August urging the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reinstate lower court orders blocking laws in Tennessee and Kentucky from being enforced.
The signatories to that brief argued that laws barring access to gender-affirming care for trans adolescents — while allowing cisgender or intersex adolescents to access identical treatments — constitute a form of sex-based discrimination.
While gender confirmation surgeries, particularly so-called “bottom surgery,” are extremely rare and not recommended for minors, anti-transgender advocates have claimed that such surgeries are not only harmful and irreversible, but widespread.
As such, any company that shows support for the LGBTQ community or transgender visibility is often characterized as being overly “woke” and tarred with “supporting sex change surgeries for minors,” even if said company has not taken a stance on gender-affirming treatments specifically.
The app retweeted Libs of TikTok’s post, adding, “We have dozens of oral care businesses on our platform that would never support this progressive gender nonsense. Stop buying from brands that hate you and your values and shift your spending to the largest marketplace of non-woke businesses.”
Many of the responses to Libs of TikTok’s post included people swearing off not only Listerine, but all Johnson & Johnson products.
“I don’t support child genital mutilation. I’ll never buy @Listerine again,” wrote one user. “Listerine is owned by Johnson and Johnson. It seems Johnson and Johnson also support child genital mutilation. Parents ought to know Johnson and Johnson supports the pedos targeting their kids.”
It is unclear what the connection between access to gender-affirming care has to do with pedophilia, but it has become a common right-wing trope online.
“I’ve used Listerine for sixty years. No more. Listerine is not getting one more penny from me. Go woke, go bankrupt, Listerine. There’s other alternatives,” wrote a second user.
The responses to Libs of TikTok’s post appear to follow a script that conservatives successfully used to pressure companies into dropping their support of Pride Month or the LGBTQ community more broadly.
As right-wing influencer Matt Walsh previously stated, the purpose of drumming up outrage against LGBTQ-supportive companies is part of a larger campaign to make “Pride toxic to brands” in an effort to get those businesses to renounce their support of the LGBTQ community.
Earlier this year, conservatives successfully targeted Bud Light, causing a disastrous drop in the company’s sales and stock price, as punishment for partnering with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney for a promotional ad on social media.
Individual Starbucks locations also appeared to cave to the anti-LGBTQ backlash, with LGBTQ employees in various locations throughout the country claiming their managers either refused to put up LGBTQ-themed decorations during Pride Month, or ordered such decorations to be taken down. The company denied reports that it was backing away from its support of LGBTQ inclusion, although a company spokesperson did concede that local store leaders can exercise their own discretion over how a store looks or which decorations it allows to be hung.
Putting the v-a-i-n in vanity project, writer-director Steve Balderson's Sex Love Venice might set records for solipsism in a queer indie protagonist, a category with an epic list of contenders.
But the film's hero Michael (David Bateman), lovelorn in L.A., takes the cake among gay movie leads whose entire world is presented as a series of interactions centered solely around him and his search for romance.
To friends Liza (Suzanna Akins) and Dave (Zaramok Bachok), Michael expresses his frustration with his life of casual hookups, revealed in flash-cuts to frank nude scenes, usually depicting a lack of enjoyment in one party or the other.
Not for anything I've said over the course of our lively hour-long phone interview one recent Saturday, but for this magazine's past transgressions.
This issue, you see, marks Cho's fourth appearance on a Metro Weekly cover in three decades, and I'm sheepishly begging forgiveness for how we handled the previous headlines, bastardizing her last name for the sake of a pun.
"Cho-Zen."
"On With the Cho."
"Cho Girl."
"It's all good," she laughs, taking it in stride. One thing about Margaret Cho is that she doesn't offend easily, if at all.
A popular LGBTQ nightclub in Sacramento, California, is prohibiting patrons who wear MAGA-related attire from entering the establishment.
Badlands, in the city's Lavender Heights district, announced the policy on social media. Management claimed they were motivated to impose the ban after a patron wore a MAGA hat while in the bar, leading some patrons to complain that they were made to feel uncomfortable and unsafe.
"At Badlands Sacramento, we are committed to creating a space where the LGBTQ+ community and our allies feel safe, welcomed, and respected," TJ Bruce, the bar's owner, wrote in a social media post. "Recently, a guest entered the bar wearing MAGA attire, which led to some discomfort among patrons.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.