The U.S. Supreme Court declined to take up a challenge to a Tennessee law seeking to restrict drag performances in the state.
In a brief, unsigned order, the court’s current justices denied a request from Friends of George’s Inc., a Tennessee-based theater company known for its drag performances, asking the high court to intervene in the case, reports The Hill.
As a result, the law will remain in effect.
In July, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled, in a 2-1 decision, that Friends of George’s lacked standing to challenge the Adult Entertainment Act on the grounds that its performances would have some artistic value and would not violate the law’s restrictions on so-called “adult cabaret entertainment.” That decision overturned a lower court’s finding that the law was unconstitutional and infringed on the free expression rights of performers.
Under the law, drag performances are defined as “adult cabaret performances,” similar to shows featuring topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, or strippers.
Any shows with adult content, content that lacks “serious literary, artistic, political or scientific values,” or material that appeals to the “prurient, shameful or morbid interests,” are prohibited from being held in places where they may be viewed by minors.
Establishments or performers found in violation of the law can be fined or potentially face jail time. Friends of George’s and other opponents of the law have argued that, because the theater does not distinguish between adult and child ticket holders, and does not card patrons, they are at risk of prosecution under the law.
In rejecting the case, the Supreme Court failed to address whether the law actively infringes on performers’ right to free speech and free expression. As a result, a final decision on the law’s constitutionality can only occur after state or local authorities attempt to prosecute an individual, group, or business for alleged violations of the law.
A separate lawsuit challenging the law on its merits is working its way through the courts.
The American Civil Liberties Union brought that lawsuit in response to a letter from Blount County District Attorney Ryan Desmond threatening to prosecute organizers of the 2023 Blount Pride festival — and the president of Maryville College, where most of the festival’s events were held — if any drag performances took place.
A federal judge ultimately issued a restraining order prohibiting Desmond and local law enforcement from attempting to enforce the law, allowing the festival to proceed. In fact, despite threats of prosecution, attendance at the festival doubled.
Friends of George’s denounced the Supreme Court justices for refusing to hear the case and pledged not to be silent in their dissent.
“Friends of George’s Theatre Company will continue exercising our First Amendment right — bringing inclusive, joyful art to our community while raising thousands for charities that uphold dignity and respect for all,” the group said in a statement.
Yeshiva University announced that it had reached a settlement with an LGBTQ student-run club that the university, for years, had refused to recognize as an official campus organization.
In the surprise move, the Orthodox Jewish educational institution said that it would end litigation related to its refusal to recognize the group, which it initially claimed was due to religious objections.
As part of the settlement, the club -- formerly known as the Yeshiva University Pride Alliance -- would be renamed "Hareni" and would be allowed to operate with the same rights and privileges guaranteed to other student groups.
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to take up a challenge to a Colorado law prohibiting mental health therapists from subjecting LGBTQ youth to conversion therapy.
The court will hear the case during its next term, which begins in October and runs through June 2026.
Conversion therapy is a practice intended to change a person's sexual orientation or gender identity to align with heterosexual or cisgender norms. Most mainstream medical organizations have largely discredited it as ineffective and potentially even harmful.
Yet, many social conservatives insist that people who hold religious beliefs opposing homosexuality should be allowed to enroll their children, or, in the case of adults, themselves, in the practice.
Republicans in nine states are calling for the overturn of marriage equality.
In Idaho, Michigan, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota, lawmakers have introduced resolutions demanding the U.S. Supreme Court reverse its landmark 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, in which the court struck down all existing state-level same-sex marriage bans.
Last month, the Idaho House of Representatives voted 46-24 to approve one such resolution, asking the nation's highest court to "restore the natural definition of marriage, a union of one man and one woman."
While the resolution is non-binding and doesn't require the Supreme Court to take action, Republican lawmakers see it as a "messaging" bill that expresses their extreme displeasure with same-sex marriage.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.