Home / News + Politics / Nation / Over 100 members of Congress blast “flawed scientific and medical assertions” justifying Trump’s transgender military ban
Over 100 members of Congress blast “flawed scientific and medical assertions” justifying Trump’s transgender military ban
Letter from congressmembers notes that DOD report "cherry-picked" outdated scientific studies to justify a ban
More than 100 members of Congress have signed onto a letter slamming Defense Secretary Jim Mattis for the “flawed scientific and medical assertions” he and other Pentagon leaders used to justify the Department of Defense’s new “Deploy or Get Out” policy, under which most transgender individuals would be categorized as “non-deployable.”
“There is a deep chasm between established medical research and the underlying analysis your Department used to justify this policy, and we call on you to reverse your recommendations,” the members of Congress write in their letter. “Furthermore, we request that you disclose the individuals on the Panel of Experts and the principal advisors they consulted in drafting the policy recommendations.”
The letter also points out that there’s a global medical consensus surrounding transition-related care for transgender people.
Most major medical and mental health organizations have expressed opposition to the military’s proposed transgender ban, which has been halted from being implemented by several federal courts.
The organizations assert that there is “no medically valid reason” to exclude transgender people from serving in the U.S. military.
“We also are concerned with the DOD’s report ‘cherry-picking’ of outdated studies to support its conclusions,” the members of Congress add. “At one point, the DOD report cites data from the Mayo Clinic that reaches back to 1971, which was years before the medical community had developed standards of care for gender dysphoria. At others, the report cites a Swedish study that includes subjects who underwent gender transition as far back as 1973.
“Further, the report does not mention that the author of this Swedish study released a subsequent study in 2016 showing, contrary to the research cited in the DOD report, that transgender individuals who obtain adequate care can be just as healthy as their peers.”
The members of Congress also note that there is no evidence in the DOD report that allowing transgender people who are receiving hormone therapy, even those who have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria, to serve would negatively impact military readiness or unit cohesion.
They also note that the report does not take into account any positive impacts that integrating transgender troops might have, citing reports of increased unit cohesion after the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”
“This ban, similar to laws against racial integration, gender integration, and service by gay men, lesbians, and bisexual people, is antithetical to our country’s and our military’s values and belies the extraordinary commitment by our transgender service members,” they conclude.
U.S. Rep. Joseph Kennedy III (D-Mass.), the chairman of the Congressional Transgender Equality Task Force, who took the lead on circulating the letter, issued his own statement blasting the Trump administration for relying on shoddy science to justify their ideological goals.
“The Trump Administration’s decision to ban transgender troops abandons our proudest values, undermines our armed forces, defies established medical research and ignores basic science,” Kennedy said. “In attempting to create justification for the President’s thoughtless policy tweets, the Department of Defense used outdated studies and cherry-picked data. If President Trump and his Administration are committed to all of our service members, they will immediately reverse this bigoted ban.”
President Donald Trump has threatened to bring the government to a standstill by refusing to sign any legislation until Congress passes the SAVE America Act, a bill requiring voters to prove their citizenship.
The bill, approved by the U.S. House of Representatives last month, is currently stalled in the Senate. It would require voters to prove their citizenship by submitting a U.S. passport or birth certificate matching the name on their voter ID when registering and present valid photo identification before casting a ballot. The measure would also require states to share voter information with the Department of Homeland Security to verify citizenship.
"Growing up, my family was politically aware," says Democratic California State Sen. Scott Wiener. "I remember in 1980, when Reagan was elected, I was 10 years old. I remember our house was a house of mourning that election night, and there was a sense in my home of just trepidation of what was going to happen because even though Reagan seems somewhat more benign than Trump, it was a very right-wing takeover.
"My family was very aware and attuned to what was happening, and especially as Jews, you're always attuned to who's taking over the government and what they could do."
Growing up in Southern New Jersey, in the suburbs of Philadelphia, Wiener, the son of an optometrist, was raised in a conservative Jewish family, with ancestors who fled the pogroms of Russia and Eastern Europe in the early 20th century before immigrating to the United States. While his hometown ultimately transitioned from a farm town into a more developed suburb, there was no local synagogue until Wiener's parents formed one with a dozen other Jewish families from the surrounding area.
AIDS United, an organization that advocates for policies and funding aimed at ending the HIV epidemic, will honor U.S. Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.), U.S. Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), and Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) at its AIDSWatch conference for their leadership and advocacy on behalf of people living with HIV.
The annual HIV advocacy event, whose theme this year is "Defending Progress, Demanding Justice," brings together people living with HIV, community leaders, and allies to confront political, budgetary, and structural threats to HIV prevention and treatment -- including limited access to health care, cuts to research funding, and laws that criminalize HIV.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.