A Wisconsin jury has awarded $780,000 in damages to two transgender state employees who were denied medical coverage for gender confirmation surgery under the state health insurance plan.
Alina Boyden, a teaching assistant at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Shannon Andrews, a cancer researcher at the UW School of Medicine and Public Health, filed a lawsuit against the state and its insurers in early 2017 after they were denied coverage for transition-related expenses.
The denial was based on a benefits exclusion adopted by the Wisconsin Group Insurance Board that prohibits coverage for procedures related to “surgery and sex hormones associated with gender reassignment.”
Andrews was forced to pay $21,000 in out-of-pocket expenses when she went forward with the surgery, while Boyden was forced to forego the surgery altogether, even though both women had been advised to receive surgery to treat their gender dysphoria.
Both women claimed that the denial of coverage violated their rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as well as under federal laws prohibiting discrimination based on sex.
In September, a federal judge ordered the state and its employers to cover Boyden and Andrews’ transition procedures, or compensate them for out-of-pocket expenses.
The judge, William Conley, found that the exclusion in the state employee health care plan violated the Fourteenth Amendment, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and provisions within the Affordable Care Act that prohibit discrimination based on gender identity.
“[The] Exclusion on its face treats transgender individuals differently on the basis of sex, thus triggering the protections of Title VII and the ACA’s anti-discrimination provision,” Conley wrote in his 47-page opinion.
A jury of eight people subsequently decided to reimburse Andrews $479,000 and awarded Boyden $301,000, reports Courthouse News.
“It was wonderful to see a process where eight ordinary Wisconsinites were able to listen to our story, see that we were harmed and make the decision that they did,” Boyden said in a statement. “No one should have to tell their story to a room full of strangers to justify their medical expenses, but I am thankful I had the opportunity to share my story. I hope this sends a powerful message to fellow transgender people in Wisconsin that our health matters.”
While courts have increasingly found in favor of transgender individuals who have been denied insurance coverage for transition-related expenses, this case marks one of the first times a jury has awarded damages to victims who were discriminated against because of such exclusions.
“Depriving transgender people of access to transition-related care is discrimination and we are pleased the jury awarded Shannon and Alina the money they need to cover their care and for the harm they suffered,” Larry Dupuis, the legal director for the ACLU of Wisconsin, said in a statement.
In the meantime, the state’s Group Insurance Board voted to change its policy regarding coverage for transition-related expenses, meaning that beginning on Jan. 1, 2019, state employees will be able to have their insurance plan cover any surgery or hormones needed to treat a person’s gender dysphoria.
James Esseks, the director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s LGBT & HIV Project, which represented the women, reflected on the significance of the jury’s decision.
“For me, it’s beyond heartening that a jury could meet two transgender women for the first time in a courtroom, understand their stories about the denial of surgery and hormone care, relate to them as fellow human beings, and award them damages like this,” Esseks said. “It’s another sign of how the country is learning more and more about transgender people, which is due to the courage of individual transgender and nonbinary people like Shannon and Alina.”
The Colorado Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit against a Christian baker who refused to create a cake celebrating a gender transition for a transgender woman on procedural grounds.
In doing so, the court sidestepped the issue of whether -- and to what extent -- a person's First Amendment rights override local nondiscrimination laws.
Lower courts in Colorado had previously ruled in favor of the woman, Autumn Scardina, finding -- based on the facts of the case -- that Jack and Debra Phillips, the owners of Masterpiece Cakeshop, in Lakewood Colorado, had discriminated against her by refusing to bake a custom-made cake only after they found out the purported significance of the cake.
"This year, we had the death of Pauly Likens, who was 14, the youngest victim we've ever recorded," says Dr. Shoshana Goldberg. "We see many victims misgendered and deadening by authorities, and reporting what emerged this year is not surprising. What is unsurprising and heartbreaking is that we just see the same things happen. Even as while the numbers may change from year to year, the same trends continue to emerge."
Goldberg is the director of public education and research at the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, the educational arm of the nation's largest LGBTQ civil rights organization. Earlier today, one day before Transgender Day of Remembrance, which memorializes those trans people who have lost their lives to murder or suicide, the foundation released a report detailing the extent of violence directed against members of the transgender and gender-nonconforming communities in the United States.
Maryland's Department of Corrections will pay $750,000 to a transgender inmate who sued the department after being viciously beaten and choked by a corrections officer.
The lawsuit stems from an incident in June 2019, when Amber Maree Canter -- who is currently in custody at the North Branch Correctional Institution in Maryland -- was on pre-trial hold at Baltimore City's Central Booking and Intake Facility.
In her lawsuit, Canter claimed that she had developed a reputation among Central Booking correctional officers as a vocal advocate for transgender rights and frequent critic of some of the facility’s policies prior to the incident, which was sparked by a dispute over Canter being denied recreational time outside of her cell.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.