By John Riley on August 9, 2021 @JRileyMW
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has asked the Texas Department of Family Protective Services’ top official to determine whether gender confirmation surgeries performed on transgender children constitute “child abuse” under Texas law.
Abbott, facing a primary challenge from real estate developer and former State Sen. Don Huffines (R-Dallas), vowed last month to prioritize a bill to restrict transgender minors from receiving gender-affirming medical care.
Abbott did not initially include the bill in a list of legislative priorities he was hoping to see passed during a special session of the legislature held last month, prompting criticism from Huffines and other political opponents who believe Abbott has not gone far enough in pushing a conservative agenda as governor.
Although an anti-transgender sports bill and other conservative measures passed the Texas Senate with ease, the whole session was largely derailed after a substantial number of House Democrats fled to Washington, D.C. in order to deny chamber leaders a quorum needed to proceed with business, in protest of a bill to place additional restrictions on non-Election Day and mail-in voting, which they say disproportionately harms communities of color.
Undeterred, Abbott called another special session for this month, in the hope that enough House Democrats would return to Texas so Republicans could jam through their preferred bills on party-line votes. But this time, he urged lawmakers to pass a ban on transition-related care.
During the regular session, the Senate passed a bill to prohibit transgender youth from receiving hormone therapy, puberty blockers, or gender confirmation surgery, defining such interventions as “child abuse.” However, the House version of the bill died after lawmakers failed to pass it by a pre-imposed deadline.
Medical experts have previously noted in testimony that surgical interventions are rarely pursued on minors, with most doctors who treat gender dysphoria in minors choosing to pursue less-invasive methods like hormone therapy or drugs to delay the onset of secondary sex characteristics that typically accompany puberty.
Nonetheless, Abbott, in a letter to DFPS that many critics have characterized as an act of political posturing, sought to have the agency declare such treatments as harmful — which may be enough to “prove” his conservative bona fides to primary voters if Texas lawmakers once again fail to obtain a quorum necessary to pass Abbott’s “wish-list” of conservative legislation.
Related: Texas Senate passes bills barring trans athletes from sports teams matching their gender identity
Casually throwing around inflammatory labels such as “child abuse” or “genital mutilation,” Abbott argued that subjecting a minor to surgery is more harmful to children, creating a so-called “genuine threat of substantial harm from physical injury to the child” — or in other words, what Texas defines as child abuse.
“This broad definition of ‘abuse’ should cover a surgical procedure that will sterilize the child, such as orchiectomy or hysterectomy, or remove otherwise healthy body parts, such as penectomy or mastectomy,” Abbott insisted.
“Indeed, Texas already outlaws female genital mutilation of a child, and presumably that also constitutes child abuse. DFPS’s determination should consider making explicit what is already implicit in the statute: that genital mutilation of a child through reassignment surgery is child abuse.”
Abbott also contended that if DFPS determines surgical interventions — however rare — constitute child abuse, then licensed medical professionals should be held accountable if they do not inform authorities of instances in which such surgery has taken place.
Besides criticizing Abbott’s refusal to acknowledge that surgical interventions are rare, LGBTQ advocates slammed Abbott’s conflation of medically necessary care with genital mutilation as an attempt to bully and disparage members of the transgender community.
“It’s literally the harshest language possible, because he wants a reaction from his side,” Andrea Segovia, the field and policy coordinator with the Transgender Education Network of Texas, told the Texas Tribune. “And they can gain supporters in that of like, ‘Oh, that sounds awful. Yeah, we shouldn’t be doing that to our minors.'”
See also: Transgender students sue Tennessee over law barring them from restrooms matching their gender
“This is nothing more than another political attempt to stigmatize transgender people, their loving families, and the healthcare providers who offer them lifesaving care,” Ricardo Martinez, the CEO of Equality Texas, said in a statement blasting Abbott’s letter.
“Every legislative year, opponents of equality present the public with a new, fabricated ’emergency’ and misinformation related to LGBTQ+ people to create fear about our community. This year the Governor’s target is children,” Martinez added.
“The language used in his letter to DFPS has nothing to do with the reality of affirming healthcare practices, which are careful, thoughtful, and backed by every credible medical association.”
A DFPS spokesperson said the agency would begin working “immediately” to determine whether it will classify gender-affirming surgery as abuse.
Abbott has pledged to keep calling special sessions until all of the legislation he has prioritized, including the anti-trans medical bill, passes.
However, advocates have argued that parents should not be intimidated by Abbott’s grandstanding from seeking out any medically necessary care that their transgender children may require.
“Our organization does not want community or parents or anybody to think that this is a letter saying that medical sort of appointments and anything like that should stop,” Segovia told the Tribune.
See also:
Christian author claims COVID is “judgment” for U.S. being “so pro-LGBT”
Carl Nassib received “nothing but love and support” from his NFL teammates after coming out
Foo Fighters trolled anti-gay Westboro Baptist protesters with disco music
By John Riley on March 22, 2025 @JRileyMW
An Ohio law prohibiting transgender youth from accessing gender-affirming care has been declared unconstitutional by a state appeals court. The court has permanently blocked officials from enforcing the ban.
On March 18, a three-judge panel of the state's 10th District Court of Appeals overturned a lower court's ruling that allowed the state to enforce the ban, reported NBC News.
The ban on gender-affirming care -- which passed along with a ban on transgender women and girls from participating on female-designated sports teams -- was passed in late 2023 but was later vetoed by Republican Gov. Mike DeWine.
By John Riley on February 27, 2025 @JRileyMW
The Pentagon will start forcibly discharging transgender service members within 60 days unless an individual can obtain a special waiver to allow them to continue serving.
On Wednesday, February 26, the Pentagon issued a policy memo outlining how the U.S. Department of Defense is complying with an executive order by President Trump to prohibit transgender individuals from serving openly in the U.S. military.
Trump's executive order claims that allowing transgender people to serve in the Armed Forces threatens military readiness and undermines unit cohesion.
It contradicts a 2016 RAND Corporation study, commissioned by the Pentagon, that found allowing transgender members to serve openly had no negative impact on unit cohesion, operational effectiveness, or readiness.
By John Riley on February 27, 2025 @JRileyMW
Republicans in nine states are calling for the overturn of marriage equality.
In Idaho, Michigan, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota, lawmakers have introduced resolutions demanding the U.S. Supreme Court reverse its landmark 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, in which the court struck down all existing state-level same-sex marriage bans.
Last month, the Idaho House of Representatives voted 46-24 to approve one such resolution, asking the nation's highest court to "restore the natural definition of marriage, a union of one man and one woman."
While the resolution is non-binding and doesn't require the Supreme Court to take action, Republican lawmakers see it as a "messaging" bill that expresses their extreme displeasure with same-sex marriage.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
Washington's LGBTQ Magazine
Follow Us:
· Facebook
· Twitter
· Flipboard
· YouTube
· Instagram
· RSS News | RSS Scene
Copyright ©2024 Jansi LLC.
You must be logged in to post a comment.