News Analysis: DOJ’s Historic Brief
DRAFT – DO NOT PUBLISH
The Department of Justice’s July 1 “Defendants’ Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss” in Karen Golinski’s lawsuit seeking equal benefits at work in the federal courts so that she can insure her wife is a must-read legal filing that became a historic document almost immediately upon its submission.
In opposing the House Republicans, who filed a brief in June seeking to have Golinski’s case dismissed, DOJ went further than Attorney General Eric Holder did in the Feb. 23 letter he sent to House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) — the letter that detailed his and President Barack Obama’s decision that Section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional and that they would no longer defend it in court.
The brief, filed in the Northern District of California, is the single most persuasive legal argument ever advanced by the United States government in support of equality for lesbian, gay and bisexual people.
Some sentences in the brief will become staples of every filing in every lawsuit attempting to advance sexual orientation non-discrimination, most notably when DOJ acknowledged, “The federal government has played a significant and regrettable role in the history of discrimination against gay and lesbian individuals.” DOJ goes on to spend two pages detailing the specifics of that discrimination, including efforts by the State Department, FBI and U.S. Postal Service to seek out or track those who were thought to be gay.
This admission is an essential part of lawyers’ arguments before courts when they are arguing why heightened scrutiny should be applied under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause to laws that classify people based on sexual orientation. To have an admission from the Department of Justice that the government did so is significant because lawyers can now go into court and say, “Not only to we think this, but so does the federal government — and they admit that they have been part of the problem.”
What’s more, DOJ took a hard line against state and local discrimination, citing more than 20 different instances of state or local discriminatory practices — from laws and judicial opinions making adoption and teaching more difficult or impossible for gay and lesbian people to police raids of gay bars, including notations of raids over the past years in Atlanta and Fort Worth, Texas.
Immediately after describing Romer v. Evans, the Supreme Court case striking down Colorado’s anti-gay constitutional amendment because the court found it to be based on “animus,” DOJ highlights the fact that, earlier this year “the Tennessee legislature enacted a law stripping counties and municipalities of their ability to pass local non-discrimination ordinances that would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, and repealing the ordinances that had recently been passed by Nashville and other localities.”
Although DOJ didn’t take a position on the constitutionality of the law, the choice to describe the law as an example of continued state discrimination — immediately following the mention of Romer — is exceptional.
Establishing a history of discrimination is just one part of the test courts use for deciding whether heightened scrutiny applies, but the DOJ brief goes on to address the others as well. In describing the issue of “political powerlessness,” for example, DOJ detailed “[t]he strong backlash in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s to … civil rights ordinances” aimed at protecting LGBT people and “similar political backlashes against same-sex marriage” in the past decade.
In short, DOJ put the imprimatur of the federal government behind the arguments advanced for decades by Lambda Legal, Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders and National Center for Lesbian Rights. And, it did so in a very concrete case, in which a woman is seeking to have the same health insurance coverage for her wife that a male employee can have for his wife.
The Golinski filing by DOJ, although only another step in the long march to LGBT equality, will leave a permanent — and large — footprint on the legal landscape.
Support Metro Weekly’s Journalism
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
