Cops vs. Condoms
Health policies and police need to work together if they want to work best
One message emerging from last week’s AIDS 2012 conference in Washington was that an AIDS-free generation is within sight, if only we muster the will to do what must be done. But a new report by Human Rights Watch (HRW) shows that the best educational efforts and universal access to treatment will not suffice if public health policies are undermined by police.
HRW, at a July 19 news conference at the National Press Club, released “Sex Workers at Risk: Condoms as Evidence of Prostitution in Four US Cities.” Those cities are New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Washington. Here I will focus on D.C.
HRW found incidents of condom-related harassment of suspected sex workers by police in six of D.C.’s seven police districts. Several women, including transgender sex workers, say they were stopped and searched by police, who accused them of prostitution upon finding condoms (which, it should be noted, are legal). Further police actions ranged from ordering the women to throw condoms away to requesting sexual favors to stomping on their wigs. These abuses are unlikely to show up in officers’ incident reports.
Such actions violate General Order PCA-501.02, which states that MPD policy “is to interact with the transgender community in a manner that is professional, respectful, and courteous.” They also hamper efforts by the group HIPS (Helping Individual Prostitutes Survive), whose Mobile Services Van distributes condoms and provides new syringe access to sex workers. HIPS outreach director Jenna Mellor told HRW, “Clients take fewer condoms than they need because they fear the police.”
David Catania, openly gay chairman of the D.C. Council Committee on Health, cited a Metropolitan Police Department official in denying the problem: “Assistant Chief Peter Newsham will tell you that that’s like an urban myth.… [In] our conversation at D.C. courts, there’s not been a single documented case of condoms being used as evidence of prostitution in recent years. Not one.”
There is a disconnect here. HRW itself acknowledges that “most stops reported to Human Rights Watch consisted of police questioning, searching, and demands to ‘move along’ without resulting in an arrest.” Indeed, Prostitution Free Zones are under legal review due to constitutional concerns, despite their not involving arrests.
At the same time, HRW states, “Newsham expressed concern that the police were discouraging the use of condoms among sex workers or any other member of the public. He said that condoms could be used as supplemental evidence collected ‘incident to arrest.’ … [He] expressed his concern that police were ‘editorializing’ about condoms in a manner that conveyed a threat to arrest sex workers for possession of condoms. Newsham agreed to consider issuing guidelines prohibiting such commentary and to underscore for MPD officers the importance of encouraging condom use.”
Newsham’s statement is encouraging, but past experience with overzealous officers suggests that revised protocols and training will not be enough. The law must be changed, as HRW recommends, to prohibit police from using condoms as evidence of prostitution.
The accounts by transgender sex workers – who are often driven into prostitution by discrimination – reveal that many police officers treat them as less than human. This is not only disgraceful and illegal, it shows a reckless disregard for public health and safety. Who do the police think hires these women – other sex workers?
Like the war on drugs, the war on prostitution is not only doomed to fail, it is harmful. I realize that politicians are not about to decriminalize prostitution anytime soon. But at least they can revise the law to prohibit police practices that undermine their cities’ public health efforts, which include condom availability for HIV prevention. Denial of a problem is a common obstacle to action. Let’s put a wrapper on that.
Richard J. Rosendall is a writer and activist. He can be reached at rrosendall@starpower.net.
Support Metro Weekly’s Journalism
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
