When the U.S. Supreme Court takes up the issue of same-sex marriage later this year, President Barack Obama hopes the nation’s highest court will make the “right decision.” During an interview on Thursday with one of three YouTube creators at the White House, Obama said he is hopeful the Supreme Court will recognize that there is “no good reason” to ban same-sex marriage.
“My hope is that they go ahead and recognize what I think the majority of people in America now recognize, which is two people who love each other and are treating each other with respect, and aren’t bothering anybody else, why would the law treat them differently?” Obama told YouTube creator GloZell Green. “There’s no good reason for it, and so as a consequence I’m hopeful the Supreme Court comes to the right decision.”
Advertisement
Obama’s remarks come after he declared marriage equality a “civil right” during his State of the Union address Tuesday night.
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a consolidated case challenging same-sex marriage bans in four states — Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee — and address whether the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits states from banning same-sex marriage or recognition of same-sex marriages legally performed elsewhere. Following that announcement, outgoing Attorney General Eric Holder reaffirmed that the Justice Department would file a brief urging the Supreme Court “to make marriage equality a reality for all Americans.” Oral arguments are expected to be heard in April with a decision handed down by the court in June.
Obama announced his support for same-sex marriage in May 2012 after his administration ceased defending the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act in February 2011. His administration later urged the Supreme Court to strike down DOMA and California’s Proposition 8.
“I will tell you peoples’ hearts have opened up on this issue,” the president said during Thursday’s interview. “I think people know that treating folks unfairly, even if you disagree with their lifestyle choice, the fact of the matter is they’re not bothering you. Let them live their lives and under the law they should be treated equally.
“And as far as me personally, just to see all the loving gay and lesbian couples that I know who are great parents and great partners, the idea that we would not treat them like the brothers and sisters they are, that doesn’t make any sense to me.”
The Trump administration is refusing to answer questions from journalists who have their preferred pronouns listed in email signatures.
The policy abides by an executive order from President Donald Trump decreeing that the U.S. government will only recognize two sexes -- male and female -- as valid.
While the Trump administration has barred federal workers from listing preferred pronouns in email signatures as part of that order, it has also refused to respond to inquiries from journalists who engage in the practice on multiple occasions, reported The New York Times.
Colorado Gov. Jared Polis signed a law repealing the state's statutory ban on same-sex marriage, just over five months after Colorado voters repealed the state's constitutional ban on recognizing such unions.
The bill, sponsored by State Sen. Jessie Danielson (D-Wheat Ridge) and State Reps. Lorena Garcia (D-Adams Co.) and Brianna Titone (D-Arvada), the state's first out elected transgender lawmaker, repealed the statutory ban, which was implemented in 2006, the same year voters approved prohibiting same-sex nuptials.
In a reflection of how Coloradans' attitudes toward same-sex marriage have changed in just under two decades, last November's ballot initiative, Constitutional Amendment J, passed by a nearly two-to-one margin, winning by healthy margins even in some of the state's more rural counties, and racking up large margins in Denver, Fort Collins, and Boulder metropolitan areas.
These are challenging times for news organizations. And yet it’s crucial we stay active and provide vital resources and information to both our local readers and the world. So won’t you please take a moment and consider supporting Metro Weekly with a membership? For as little as $5 a month, you can help ensure Metro Weekly magazine and MetroWeekly.com remain free, viable resources as we provide the best, most diverse, culturally-resonant LGBTQ coverage in both the D.C. region and around the world. Memberships come with exclusive perks and discounts, your own personal digital delivery of each week’s magazine (and an archive), access to our Member's Lounge when it launches this fall, and exclusive members-only items like Metro Weekly Membership Mugs and Tote Bags! Check out all our membership levels here and please join us today!
You must be logged in to post a comment.